Solutions · Workflow & AI automation
Let the repetitive work run itself. Your team keeps the decisions.
We put language models where they save real hours — documents, mail, matching, summaries — and design every feature so a person can see where a suggestion came from and approve it before it counts.

Where it helps
Work that is repetitive, but not mindless
Reading documents
Invoices, judgments, contracts and forms read into fields, each next to the line it came from.
Sorting the mailbox
Every message classified with the reason, so the right person sees it first.
Drafting replies
Answers built from the case file, with any missing fact left as a visible gap.
Matching and reconciling
Bank lines to invoices, claims to cases, with the uncertain ones set aside for a person.
Summaries and next steps
Who is waiting for whom on a case, in two lines, from the record itself.
Assistants that classify
The model picks a request from a closed list; the query itself is code we wrote, inside your permissions.
Accountable automation
The rules every AI feature we build follows
The model proposes, a person approves
Nothing is saved, sent or posted from model output without an approval that records who and when.
Every field shows its source
The sentence or line it came from, and how confident the model is.
Gaps stay visible
What the model was not given stays in [brackets] for a person to fill — it never guesses a number.
Rules decide what rules should
Legal deadlines, amounts and permissions come from written rules, never from a model.
Every call on record
Each request is logged, counted against a monthly ceiling, and can be switched off per client.
Works without it
Each feature has a non-AI path, so a provider outage slows you down instead of stopping you.
Try the approval flow
The model prepares. A person approves.
We automate the conversations and paperwork that eat your team’s day: WhatsApp and customer service, inboxes, replies, payments and documents. Routine answers go out on their own, inside rules you set; money, promises and exceptions wait for a person, with the source of every suggestion on screen. Try it:
Shared mailbox · 5 newNames and figures are illustrative
- claims@northsea-insure.exampleNew case: Mr R. Olsen, Phuket — policy NS-55120
- billing@cityhospital.exampleInvoice INV-20417 (PDF attached)
- ops@alpine-assist.exampleAny update on MFA-002380?
- news@medtravel-weekly.exampleThis week in travel health
- j.weber@lakeside-clinic.exampleIntroduction
Sorted, with the reason for eachWaiting for a person
- New case: Mr R. Olsen, Phuket — policy NS-55120New case request95%↳ Names a patient, a place and a policy numberCase proposal prepared
- Invoice INV-20417 (PDF attached)Provider invoice97%↳ Known provider, PDF with an invoice numberQueued for invoice reading
- Any update on MFA-002380?Status question93%↳ Quotes an open case referenceReply drafted — see “Draft a reply”
- This week in travel healthNewsletter99%↳ Bulk sender with an unsubscribe headerArchived
- Introduction52%↳ No case, no invoice, sender not on fileLeft for a person
Incoming e-mailNames and figures are illustrative
From: ops@alpine-assist.example
Subject: Any update on MFA-002380?
Hello, any update on Ms L. Brandt (MFA-002380)?
Has the GOP been issued, and for what amount?
Thanks — Ops desk
Draft built from the case fileWaiting for a person
- CaseMFA-002380 · Ms L. Brandt99%
- StatusAdmitted 27 Oct, under observation96%
- GOP issued toCity General Hospital, 28 Oct94%
- GOP amountNot in the file?
The amount was not in the file, so the model left a visible gap instead of guessing.
Bank statement · 3 linesNames and figures are illustrative
27 Oct · NORTHSEA INSURANCE · REF INV-1182 · EUR 4,200.00
27 Oct · ALPINE ASSIST AG · MFA002311 · EUR 1,962.50
28 Oct · INCOMING TRANSFER · NO REFERENCE · EUR 880.00
Proposed matchesWaiting for a person
- EUR 4,200.00 →INV-1182 · Northsea Insurance · EUR 4,200.0099%↳ Same amount, reference quoted
- EUR 1,962.50 →INV-1179 · case MFA-002311 · EUR 2,000.0074%↳ Case reference matches; EUR 37.50 short, likely bank chargesLow confidence — check it against the source
- EUR 880.00 →50%↳ No reference, and two open invoices for exactly EUR 880.00
Scanned judgment · ArabicNames and figures are illustrative
حكم — الدائرة التجارية الثالثة
القضية رقم 4400 لعام 1448هـ
المدعي: مؤسسة الأفق للسفر
المدعى عليه: شركة النخبة المحدودة
صدر الحكم بتاريخ 12/10/2026م
وحكمت المحكمة بإلزام المدعى عليه بأداء 120,000 ريال
وتسلّم وكيل المدعى عليه نسخة الحكم بتاريخ 15/10/2026م
Read by the model · deadline by the rulesWaiting for a person
- Case no.4400 / 1448 AH98%
- Plaintiffمؤسسة الأفق للسفر97%
- Defendantشركة النخبة المحدودة97%
- Amount awardedSAR 120,00095%
Dates the model found are shown, never used as deadlines.
Appeal window — 30 days from receipt
- Starts the day after receipt: 16 Oct 2026
- + 30 days → Sat 14 Nov 2026
- Weekend → moved to Sun 15 Nov 2026
Sun 15 Nov 2026
An illustrative rule. Real rules carry their legal source and the date they were last reviewed.
Provider invoice · PDFNames and figures are illustrative
Harbour Medical Centre — Invoice
Invoice no. INV-20417
Date: 14 Oct 2026
Patient ref: CASE-8842
Consultation and imaging
Total due: AED 3,450.00
Extracted for reviewWaiting for a person
- ProviderHarbour Medical Centre98%
- Invoice no.INV-2041799%
- Date14 Oct 202696%
- CaseCASE-884271%Low confidence — check it against the source
- AmountAED 3,450.0097%
Automate the work inside your company
What happens on its own, the moment something arrives.
Pick what starts it and press play. Each step is something a person used to do by hand.
When this happens
- WhatsAppCustomer sends the order
- Your systemOrder recorded with the customer’s details
- ManagerApproves orders above AED 5,000
- InvoiceInvoice created as PDF
- StockQuantities updated
- WhatsAppConfirmation and invoice sent to the customer
- EmailInvoice PDF arrives
- AISupplier, amount and date read from the PDF
- Your systemMatched with the purchase order
- AccountantApproves the payment
- AccountsRecorded and scheduled for payment
- EmailSupplier told when they’ll be paid
- Ad formLead fills in the form
- CRMSaved, duplicates checked
- WhatsAppWelcome message within a minute
- SalesAssigned to the right salesperson
- ReminderFollow-up reminder in two days
- ReportCounted in the weekly report
Where we built it
Questions we are often asked
Which AI models do you use?
Each feature sits behind its own interface, so the provider can be chosen per client — including ones that keep data in a particular region. The system also runs with AI switched off.
Is our data used to train models?
We use providers and settings that do not train on your data, send only what a task needs, and log every call.
What happens when the model is wrong?
A person sees the suggestion with its source and confidence before it counts. Low-confidence fields are flagged and need an explicit check.
Can costs run away?
No. Every call goes through one gate with a monthly ceiling per client.
Have a system like this in mind?
Tell us how your team works today. We will tell you honestly what we would build, or whether an existing product is enough.


